Author:

Oliver Gomez, Co-Founder at Usul

Selling to the Government:
A Silicon Valley Startup Playbook

Selling to the Government:
A Silicon Valley Startup Playbook

Selling to the Government:
A Silicon Valley Startup Playbook

Selling to the Government:
A Silicon Valley Startup Playbook

Overview

The Department of War is forecasted to spend $1.5 trillion in 2027, with roughly $780 billion of that flowing directly to corporations through procurement contracts.  It buys software, hardware, services, and increasingly, frontier technology. It is the biggest customer in the world, and Silicon Valley has largely forgotten how to sell to it.

For decades, winning contracts was architected around legacy prime contractors, entrenched relationships, and a regulatory surface area thick enough to repel most founders back to the commercial sector. The system rewarded incumbency and punished speed.

Companies like Anduril and Palantir were the first to seriously challenge this structure, but doing so required billionaire founders, years of absorbed pain, and in Palantir's case, literally suing the U.S. Army for fair competition. The deeper shift has come from the top. The current administration has made commercial-first procurement a genuine priority, orienting the bureaucracy around execution and outcomes rather than cost-plus contracts and slide decks. A wave of executive orders has stripped away regulatory layers that had gone untouched for a generation.

What remains is a window that has not existed before. Record high venture capital investment, political will, and aggressive cuts to acquisition policy are converging at the same moment. New entrants can now compete for contracts that would have been structurally inaccessible five years ago.

This guide is written for founders who have built something real and are now asking whether the government should be a customer, and if so, how to find, engage, and close it

How to Use This Guide

The path you take depends on one question: does demand for your capability already exist inside the government, or are you creating something genuinely new?

If demand exists, the path is structured and learnable. You start with the Small Business Innovative Research Program (SBIR), move into CSO and OTA vehicles, and work toward direct contracts with end users by finding and aligning with the right demand signal. That path is covered in detail in Part III.

If you are building something genuinely new, the path is different. You are in charge of creating your own demand signal. That requires a different kind of relationship-building, a longer runway, and a different commercial strategy. That path is covered in Part IV.


Both paths are real and have produced billion-dollar outcomes.

Part I: How the Government Spends Money 

The DoW budget is divided into three categories, called colors of money. Each one funds a different stage of capability development, flows through different offices, and requires a different kind of pitch. Knowing which color you are competing for is the first thing you need to figure out.


RDT&E (Research, Development, Test and Evaluation) funds the creation of new capabilities. This is the bucket that pays for prototypes, pilots, grants, and early-stage technology development. This is the government’s experimental dollars to fund new frontier capabilities, this is famously how we got GPS and the Internet. For most startups, this is where you will enter. 

Procurement funds the actual purchase of systems at scale. Once a capability has been validated, procurement dollars are what turn a contract into a program of record. A program of record means the government has formally committed to buying your capability, it has its own budget line, its own program office, and it gets funded year after year through the appropriations process. Getting here takes time, but this is the promised land. Recurring, mandated, multi-year revenue.

O&M (Operations and Maintenance) funds the day-to-day running of existing systems, including software licenses, training, sustainment, and support services. If you are selling SaaS or managed services into an already-deployed system, this is likely the funding color you are competing for.


In short, RDT&E funded the decade of engineering that produced the F-35, Procurement bought 640 of them, and O&M keeps them all flying.

Part II: Finding Your Demand Signal

Before you do anything, you need to answer one question: does the government already know it has the problem you solve?


This is not a philosophical question. It has a concrete answer, and you can find it through public documents.


Start with the budgets.

Every year, the President submits a Budget Request to Congress that breaks down planned spending across every federal agency and capability area. For the Department of War, the authoritative source is the Office of the Undersecretary of War's Comptroller, which publishes the full set of budget justification documents here, with FY2027 line-item PDFs and XMLs linked here.


These documents are the ground truth for what the government intends to fund. Each one maps to a specific capability area, program office, or mission system, with a dollar figure attached. If your technology fits inside a funded program line, demand exists. If you cannot find a program line that maps to what you do, that most likely means there is no existing demand for your capability.


How to navigate them without losing your mind

There are hundreds of these documents. Do not try to read them sequentially. Instead, create a Claude project, describe what you build in plain language, upload or paste the index of budget document titles, and ask it to rank the top ten budget documents worth investigating. From there you can keyword search or vibe code a parser to go through them to identify funding lines matched to your capabilities.


You’re not looking to map your whole TAM here just see if there is money allocated for what you’re building.


Then go to SAM.gov.

SAM.gov publishes every active federal contract and solicitation. Search for contracts in your domain and look at what is already being bought, from whom and at what value. If there are existing contracts for capabilities adjacent to yours, that is a demand signal. It also tells you who the incumbents are and which contracting vehicles are being used, both of which matter for the path you take.


What you are looking for is a demand signal: a funded program, an active solicitation, or a published requirement that maps to your capability. 


If you find one, you have a path. 


If you cannot find one, you are building a new market inside the government, and the playbook is different. That is covered in Part IV.

Part III: The Path if There is Demand

Step 1: Map Your Customers Before You Do Anything Else


You will be tempted to start applying for SAM.gov contracts that are asking for your product. DO NOT DO THIS. The vast majority of these contracts are shaped by other companies and have already been won. Thus, you need to play by their rules and do the same. You need to know exactly who inside the government cares about what you build, who has money for it and who has the authority to champion it.


The Department of War is the largest organization in the world employing roughly 3 million people. There are hundreds of program offices, each with its own priorities, funding amounts and buying authority. Your first job is to find the handful that have an obligation and money to buy your shiny thing.


Start with Steve Blank's directory here, which maps the entire DoW acquisition structure by portfolio and office. Work through it systematically. For each office that seems relevant, you want to know: what is their stated mission, what programs are they currently running, who leads them, and what have they bought recently.

What you are building is a target account list, the same way a commercial sales team would. Except here, your accounts are Portfolio Acquisition Executives, program managers, and contracting officers rather than VP of Engineering titles.



Step 2: Understand the Contracting Structure


Once you know who your buyers are, you need to understand the mechanics of how they actually purchase things. This is where most founders get stuck. The government cannot simply wire you money because a general you stopped at a conference said “good work” to your demo. Every purchase has to flow through a contract vehicle, a legally established mechanism that authorizes the government to buy from companies. If you do not have a contract vehicle, you cannot get paid, regardless of how much your end users want what you build.


The traditional path: FAR-based contracting

Most of the Department of War still runs on the Federal Acquisition Regulation. The standard FAR-based process runs from Request for Information (RFI) to Request for Proposal (RFP) to award, a cycle that routinely takes one to three years. It was designed for large defense programs with established requirements, long timelines, and prime contractors.

As a startup, you do not have the bandwidth to compete on these. A full FAR-based RFP response can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in proposal preparation, require compliance infrastructure you have not built, and you will most likely lose to an incumbent who has held the relationship for a decade. 

The good news is that the government has spent the last several years building faster on-ramps specifically designed for commercial companies. The three that matter most for startups are SBIRs, CSOs, and OTAs.


SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research)

SBIRs are the most startup-friendly entry point into government contracting. The federal government deploys roughly $4 billion through SBIRs annually. The DoW publishes every open SBIR request publicly here. Each topic represents a specific problem an end customer funded and is motivated to solve. If a program office is writing SBIR topics in your area, they have budget, they have a documented problem, and they are actively looking for a company to hand money to.

The program runs in three phases, and each one serves a different purpose. Phases I and Phase II are one-time grants. Phase III awards you a contract vehicle.

Phase I awards typically range from $50,000 to $250,000 for a six to twelve month period of work. The output is usually a feasibility study, a white paper, or a proof-of-concept demo. Taken in isolation, Phase I money won’t make your business overnight but it gets you in the room to start building relationships and hearing real problems. Winning a Phase I means a program office has formally validated that your approach to their problem is worth investigating. 

Phase II awards range around $750,000-$2,000,000 for a two-year period of work. Phase II work almost always requires active prototyping, usually involving direct collaboration with an actual DoD unit or end user. You are building and iterating in front of a real customer, which means you are simultaneously developing the product and developing the champions inside the bureaucracy who will eventually advocate for buying it at scale. If you win one of these, it’s critical you execute on it well.

Phase III is the transition. Unlike Phase I and II, Phase III is not a grant and it does not draw from the SBIR program's own research funds. It is procurement money, typically allocated by a Portfolio Acquisition Executive from their own program budget. What Phase III gives you is a contract vehicle from which anyone across the DoW can legally buy from you directly, without needing to run a new competition or spin up a new contract. They route their procurement funds straight to your Phase III. There is no ceiling on Phase III contract value. Find every customer with budget and a need, and sell.

Anduril is a golden example of mastering this playbook by using their early SBIRs to transact over $445 million on their Phase III’s.

CSO (Commercial Solutions Opening) is a faster contracting method that lets program offices buy commercial technology without a full FAR-based procurement process. Submissions are typically a whitepaper or a short pitch video rather than a formal proposal. Program offices can now award a follow-on production OTA directly from a successful CSO, which speeds up the path to a production contract. OTA awards are negotiated as commercial agreements rather than FAR contracts, meaning your IP and data rights are actually negotiable rather than defaulting to the government's broad data rights position. SBIRs are a great way to get your foot in the door, CSO -> OTA is another great way to start generating real revenue quickly from the federal government.

OTA (Other Transaction Authority) is the most flexible vehicle of the three. OTAs allow the government to contract for prototype development outside the standard FAR framework entirely, which means faster execution, fewer compliance requirements, and more room to negotiate deal terms. The current administration has pushed hard to expand OTA usage, and most of the interesting early-stage defense contracts are now flowing through this mechanism.

One dynamic worth understanding: the current administration has made it significantly easier for end users, meaning the soldiers, analysts, or operators who would actually use your product, to pull technology toward themselves. A unit with a documented pain point can now organize demonstrations and rapid evaluations much faster than the traditional acquisition process used to allow.


Step 3: Find Your End Users and Get in Front of Them

Program offices control who gets the contract and end users create the demand. Think of program offices like a parent doing the family grocery shopping on someone else's dime. They get a list of requirements and a budget, and they decide which brand of eggs, which clothes, which gear to buy. But if the kids at home are loudly enthusiastic about one specific brand of eggs, that preference carries weight in the selection. End users are the kids. Their advocacy changes the outcome.

The fastest path to a contract is finding the operator, analyst, or warfighter who genuinely needs what you build, getting them to use it, and letting them become your internal champion inside the bureaucracy.

The way you find these people is by going where they gather. There is a circuit of industry days, demonstrations, and conferences where government buyers and operators show up specifically to see what commercial technology exists. AFWERX, NSIN, DIU demo days, and service-specific innovation events are the most accessible entry points. Show up with your demonstration and results in hand, blow them away and they will help find the right stakeholders for you to talk to. Always always always ask how they buy things, figure out if you’re talking to the person with the pain point or the money.

Part IV: There Is No demand For What You Build

This is the harder path. The government doesn’t know it needs what you build. You need to create your own demand signal. This requires working from two directions simultaneously: top down from policymakers and the hill, and bottom up from end users. Be warned, this usually takes a lot of time and capital. You either need to have a very successful commercial business or a lot of money in the bank.


The Two-Year Valley of Death

There is a well-documented gap in defense technology development commonly called the valley of death. It sits between early research funding and committed procurement dollars through a program of record. You can win a Phase II SBIR, build something real, have end users who love it, and still find yourself with no follow-on funding while the bureaucracy runs in circles trying to formalize demand for your capability. That process can take two years or longer. The reason is because getting a procurement line item in the justification books requires tons of shaping and generating user advocacy and lobbying for congressional approval.

The companies that survive this gap do so by finding bridge funding through venture capital or research dollars from the innovation arms of the DoW.


Research Funding to Bridge the Gap

While you are doing the longer work of creating demand, several government organizations exist specifically to fund frontier technology that hasn’t made its way to production yet. Steve Blank's 2026 DoW Directory is the most comprehensive public resource for navigating all of them. Read the full breakdown in the Federal Labs section starting on page 29. What follows is a high-level overview.

The labs and innovation arms are organized by service, and each one has a slightly different mandate, contracting mechanism, and technology focus. Each service branch has their own but the two main ones outside of the services are:

DARPA: The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency funds companies pushing on frontier tech that’s usually decades ahead of the commercial sector. The agency funds a ton of work outside of the FAR through OTAs allowing them to move quicker than other agencies.

Defense Innovation Unit (DIU): DIU sits outside the service structure and is the only DoW organization focused exclusively on fielding and scaling commercial technology across the entire military at commercial speeds. It operates a roughly $1 billion acquisition budget, runs CSOs with 60 to 90 day timelines to contract, and has OTA authority. DIU currently focuses on AI, autonomy, cyber and telecom, emerging technology, energy, human systems, and space. They’re based in silicon valley. If you’re here, they’re worth a visit.


Bottom Up: End User Mapping and Creating Organic Pull

The fastest way to create demand is to find the people who would use your product, get it in their hands, and help them champion for you.

Start by mapping your end users the same way you mapped program offices in Part III. Who are the operators, analysts, or commanders who would benefit most directly from what you build? What units and bases are they in? Where are they located? What exercises, demonstrations, or events do they attend? Get into the rooms where these people are and show them capabilities that can save lives, save time, or increase lethality.

End users cannot buy from you directly, but they can document a need, write a requirement, request a demonstration, and advocate up their chain of command. That documentation is the seed of a formal requirement, and formal requirements are what ultimately form budgets.

Every year, the Pentagon runs a competitive prioritization process where operational problems get ranked and that ranking determines where money flows. A capability with no documented, advocated-for problem behind it does not compete regardless of how good the product is.

When operators use your product and document the gap it solves, they are feeding the annual cycle that determines what gets funded. When that happens across multiple units independently, the signal becomes very hard for requirements offices and senior leaders to ignore. A capability gap with multiple end users writing it up, commanders referencing it, and requirements officers pushing it up the chain has a real chance of landing where budget decisions get made.


Top Down: Lobbying, Line Items, and Getting Into the Budget

The top-down path runs through Congress and the senior policy layer of the department. It is highly relationship dependent, and having a fractional office or a decent physical presence in DC is worth the investment. A congressional line item is arguably the most defensible position in the defense market. Once your capability has its own budget line in the FYDP, you have mandated recurring revenue basically written for you.

Getting there requires understanding how requirements and budget lines actually get created.

The formal requirements process that existed for decades, JCIDS, was disestablished in 2025. The replacement is faster: the Pentagon now runs an annual cycle where the Joint Staff ranks the joint force's most critical operational problems, and a senior board co-chaired by the Deputy Secretary of Defense connects those problems directly to the budget. The problems that land at the top of that annual list are the ones that get allocated dedicated funding. A capability tied to a named, ranked operational problem is in a much stronger position than one floating weakly at the bottom of the list. The people you are trying to influence, program offices, service budget shops, and joint staff officers, are all operating inside this cycle.

The practical near-term target is the FYDP cycle. The Future Years Defense Program is built on a two-year planning horizon and the window to influence what goes into it is narrow. Budget requests are assembled roughly eighteen months before they are submitted to Congress. If you want a line item in FY2029, the conversations with program offices and service budget shops need to be happening now. The way you influence those conversations is by having end user champions submitting capability gap documents, senior advisors with relationships inside the building, and a presence in the policy discussions happening at the OSD and service secretariat level.

Lobbying in the defense context is less about paying a firm to walk the halls of Congress and more about sustained relationship-building with the staffers, program executives, and political appointees who shape budget decisions. Former senior officials, retired flag officers, and people who have moved between industry and government are the connective tissue here. If you do not have advisors who have sat inside the building and understand how budget decisions actually get made, recruiting them should be a high priority.

The congressional path runs parallel to the executive branch path. Staffers on the Armed Services Committees and Defense Appropriations Subcommittees are the people who can insert program earmarks, add language to authorization bills that creates a requirement for a specific capability, or request program evaluations that put your technology in front of decision-makers. Getting to these staffers requires either a direct relationship or someone who has one.

Epirus is a great case study here. Founded in 2018 and having raised over $600 million, the company builds high-powered microwave systems for counter-drone solutions. By FY2025 they had a dedicated $14.4 million line item written into the NDAA specifically for counter-UAS high-powered microwave acceleration. By the FY2026 NDAA, high-powered microwave was named explicitly in the statutory language as a covered counter-UAS technology class. Pretty much no other counter UAS technology company uses that language thereby giving them a direct shot and requirement from the top down.

In order to succeed at scale at creating a demand signal from scratch you have to run both of these processes simultaneously. It’s difficult but when done successfully the sky is the limit.


Be ethical, be secure and solve real problems. There will be lives on the line.

The trusted AI partner for government contractors.

The trusted AI partner for
government contractors.

Unleash your experience.